http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/2009/04/17/online-news-should-be-replayable/ Entrepreneurial local journalism Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:17:28 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/2009/04/17/online-news-should-be-replayable/comment-page-1/#comment-32 Michael Mon, 20 Jul 2009 08:59:35 +0000 http://www.howtowalkacrossthecountry.com/treetest/?p=60#comment-32 Testing, testing. Move along. Testing, testing. Move along.

]]> http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/2009/04/17/online-news-should-be-replayable/comment-page-1/#comment-31 Michael Fri, 01 May 2009 22:59:00 +0000 http://www.howtowalkacrossthecountry.com/treetest/?p=60#comment-31 Great point, Anon -- the endless churn of "new study shows..." newspaper stories is one of the biggest problems with science coverage, I'd say. Great point, Anon — the endless churn of “new study shows…” newspaper stories is one of the biggest problems with science coverage, I’d say.

]]> http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/2009/04/17/online-news-should-be-replayable/comment-page-1/#comment-30 Anonymous Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:34:00 +0000 http://www.howtowalkacrossthecountry.com/treetest/?p=60#comment-30 One point I didn't see in the article is that switching to a blog-wiki format would make the news less vulnerable to spin. When a think tank releases a new "study" on a controversial issue, for example, the blog would report the release and then point readers to the wiki entry that details the evidence provided and questions raised by all sides involved in the controversy. One point I didn’t see in the article is that switching to a blog-wiki format would make the news less vulnerable to spin. When a think tank releases a new “study” on a controversial issue, for example, the blog would report the release and then point readers to the wiki entry that details the evidence provided and questions raised by all sides involved in the controversy.

]]>