<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Old Forest, New Trees &#187; newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/category/newspapers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurial local journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>In which hog fuel demonstrates that paid content has potential</title>
		<link>http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/2009/05/01/in-which-hog-fuel-demonstrates-that-paid-content-has-potential/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/2009/05/01/in-which-hog-fuel-demonstrates-that-paid-content-has-potential/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 08:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iconoclasm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[papermaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtowalkacrossthecountry.com/treetest/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the best case against paid news content. It&#8217;s two sentences long:
&#8220;We tried that. It didn&#8217;t work.&#8221;
But there&#8217;s a powerful rebuttal to that case, one that grizzled online-news veterans (like my man Steve Yelvington, linked above) miss: The economics have changed since last time.
No, consumer desires haven&#8217;t changed since 1996. Sorry, Al, they wouldn&#8217;t pay [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.laneforestproducts.com/images/products_hogfuel_2.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 139px; height: 191px;" src="http://www.laneforestproducts.com/images/products_hogfuel_2.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a>Here&#8217;s the best case against paid news content. It&#8217;s two sentences long:</p>
<p>&#8220;<a href="http://www.yelvington.com/node/540">We tried that. It didn&#8217;t work.</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>But there&#8217;s a powerful rebuttal to that case, one that grizzled online-news veterans (like my man Steve Yelvington, linked above) miss: The economics have changed since last time.</p>
<p>No, consumer desires haven&#8217;t changed since 1996. Sorry, <a href="http://newsosaur.blogspot.com/2004/12/why-buy-cow-when-milk-is-free.html">Al</a>, they wouldn&#8217;t pay for traditional newspaper content online then, and they won&#8217;t now. But <span style="font-weight:bold;">local media incentives have changed since 1996</span>.</p>
<p>The real question: whether those incentives have changed enough to force newspapers to make the <span style="font-weight:bold;">crucial shift that could keep them alive</span> &#8212; a shift to niche products.</p>
<p>If you want to understand how newspaper incentives have changed, you need to understand the following short story from the great Northwest.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a story about hog fuel.</p>
<p><span id="more-62"></span>Hog fuel is a byproduct of papermaking. It&#8217;s basically a bunch of tree scraps that get left on the mill floor because they aren&#8217;t even good for turning into pulp. Paper plants, like <a href="http://www.longviewfibre.com/">this one</a> in my old hometown, produce hog fuel by the metric ton; they can&#8217;t avoid it.</p>
<p>What do you do with a nearly worthless byproduct? Maybe you could find some odd use for it. But that&#8217;d take a lot of work: gathering it, measuring it, marketing it, lining up buyers and shipping it to them. And for what? Obviously your workers&#8217; precious time would be better spent on the operation that makes the real money: paper.</p>
<p>No, it&#8217;s much easier to find some use for hog fuel that costs nothing. And that&#8217;s exactly what paper mills do: they burn it. Hog-fuel furnaces offset a huge share of many paper plants&#8217; substantial electricity bills. It&#8217;s a cheap and effective way to dispose of something you&#8217;ve got too much of.</p>
<p>But what if paper suddenly ceased to be so profitable?</p>
<p>What would happen to your hog fuel then?</p>
<p>You&#8217;d still have a mill that&#8217;s very good at chopping up trees. But suddenly, you&#8217;d start looking closer at your hog fuel. You might start looking for those obscure hog-fuel markets. You might start chopping your logs a bit differently to maximize the value of that hog fuel. You might even start researching how to turn hog fuel into something really valuable, like ethanol &#8212; research that would have never been worthwhile before.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got incentives you never had before to make hog fuel valuable.</p>
<p>Hog fuel is Web content. Paper is &#8212; well, paper.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight:bold;">In 1996, when the print product was gushing cash, the rational thing to do with newspaper content online was to throw it up for free</span>. Unlike with paid online content, which requires a helpdesk, a sales effort, and maybe even some changes to the production process, the marginal costs of free content were minimal.</p>
<p>The newsroom was already churning out a metric ton of content, after all. So what if it wasn&#8217;t optimized for online readership? Hire a kid to hit CTRL-C/CTRL-V for an hour or two each morning, and you&#8217;ll get some cheap exposure, a hunk of cheap online ad sales and a cheap feeling of progress.</p>
<p>But now, the paper market has dried up.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time to figure out what to do with all this crap we&#8217;ve been leaving on the floor, kids. We can squeeze money out of it. <span style="font-weight:bold;">We just have to change the process a bit.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/2009/05/01/in-which-hog-fuel-demonstrates-that-paid-content-has-potential/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
