<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Old Forest, New Trees &#187; nonprofit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/category/nonprofit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurial local journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nonprofiteers are capitalists, too</title>
		<link>http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/2009/11/02/nonprofiteers-are-capitalists-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/2009/11/02/nonprofiteers-are-capitalists-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[nonprofit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff Jarvis has been pooh-poohing news that&#8217;s subsidized by governments or do-gooders:
I see another danger &#8230; that not-for-profit ventures will delay or even choke off for-profit, sustainable entrepreneurship in news. I would prefer to see various of the many funders who gave funds to not-for-profit endeavors – note $5 million give to a new not-for-profit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff Jarvis has been <a href="http://newsinnovation.com/2009/11/02/the-future-of-news-is-entrepreneurial/">pooh-poohing</a> news that&#8217;s subsidized by <a href="http://newsinnovation.com/2009/10/19/giving-up-on-the-news-business/">governments</a> or <a href="http://newsinnovation.com/2009/10/02/journalism-as-capitalism/">do-gooders</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>I see another danger &#8230; that not-for-profit ventures will delay or even choke off for-profit, sustainable entrepreneurship in news. I would prefer to see various of the many funders who gave funds to not-for-profit endeavors – note <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-with-5-million-grant-in-hand-bay-area-non-profit-news-site-takes-shape/">$5 million</a> give to a new not-for-profit entity in the Bay area – instead had invested in for-profit companies that can build companies that support and sustain themselves rather than rely on hand-outs. That is God’s work.</p></blockquote>
<p>Jarvis intends this as a paean to capitalism. But he&#8217;s got <strong>a weirdly non-capitalist way of thinking about nonprofits</strong>.</p>
<p>Jarvis&#8217;s notion that nonprofits are an anomaly in the market system &#8212; and therefore less &#8220;sustainable&#8221; &#8212; forgets the fact that <strong>nonprofits produce goods and function within the market system like anybody else</strong>.</p>
<p>Sometimes they produce public services for governments. Sometimes they produce warm fuzzies for rich donors.</p>
<p>Wherever the money comes from, <strong>a successful nonprofit has found a market for whatever it&#8217;s producing</strong>. That&#8217;s God&#8217;s work, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/2009/11/02/nonprofiteers-are-capitalists-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
