<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Old Forest, New Trees &#187; relevance-is-mandatory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/category/relevance-is-mandatory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurial local journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Relevance is mandatory, so pick a niche</title>
		<link>http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/2009/07/31/relevance-is-mandatory-so-pick-a-niche/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/2009/07/31/relevance-is-mandatory-so-pick-a-niche/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 06:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[commandments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general-audience-die-die]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pick-a-niche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relevance-is-mandatory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtowalkacrossthecountry.com/treetest/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First in a series.
Here&#8217;s one of my four core principles for today&#8217;s media market: these days, relevance is mandatory.
I&#8217;m not talking about some of your content. I&#8217;m talking about all of your content.
If you&#8217;re not scared yet, you should be.
Yesterday, distribution costs were high, which made information scarce. The only way to distribute information was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-style:italic;">First in a <a href="http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/2009/07/31/four-principles-four-commandments/">series</a>.</span></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s one of my four core principles for today&#8217;s media market: these days, <span style="font-weight:bold;">relevance is mandatory</span>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not talking about some of your content. I&#8217;m talking about all of your content.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not scared yet, you should be.</p>
<p><span id="fullpost">Yesterday, distribution costs were high, which made information scarce. The only way to distribute information was to spend lots of capital on a printing press or a broadcast tower. The only way to make this investment pay off was to make everyone interested in your content.</span></p>
<p><span id="more-53"></span>But the things that interest everyone, like the workings of government, don&#8217;t interest anyone very <em>much</em>. What <span style="font-style:italic;">does </span>interest people a lot? Their pets. Gardening. Figure skating. But each of these only appeals a lot to a <span style="font-style:italic;">few </span>people &#8230; and it wasn&#8217;t worth distributing content at great expense to a few. There weren&#8217;t enough figure skating fans in a single media market to pay for their content.</p>
<p>So publishers focused on things that interested everyone <span style="font-style:italic;">a little bit</span>.</p>
<p>Today, distribution costs are low, which makes information plentiful. But that&#8217;s not all: <span style="font-style:italic;">relevant</span> information is now plentiful. There&#8217;s now an international market online for the free distribution of figure-skating-related content, and those of us who care about figure skating can finally do what we always wanted: read about figure skating for an hour every day.</p>
<p>Aha! That&#8217;s the catch. <strong>Information is now plentiful, but time remains scarce</strong>. When people prioritize their time, of course they always start by consuming the available information that&#8217;s most relevant to them, gradually moving to less and less relevant information.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what&#8217;s new: things that interest everyone <span style="font-style:italic;">a little bit</span> aren&#8217;t anywhere near the top of that list any more. Newspapers&#8217; problem, therefore, is not that people have become less interested in City Hall. It&#8217;s that we&#8217;ve always been interested in lots of things other than City Hall, and now those other, more intense interests can be fed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to read about City Hall, but I&#8217;ve got no time. I just spent an hour reading about figure skating.</p>
<p>In economic terms, less-relevant information has not fallen in absolute value. But the people who spend time consuming it are facing <strong>rising opportunity costs</strong>.</p>
<p>Therefore, news startups should <span style="font-weight:bold;">pick a niche</span> &#8212; a niche that a few people care about quite a lot. Or several niches, if they go together for some reason. But for God&#8217;s sake, don&#8217;t get caught out in the open, peddling a product that everybody cares about a little bit.</p>
<p>Newspapers already tried it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/2009/07/31/relevance-is-mandatory-so-pick-a-niche/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>King Content needs a diet</title>
		<link>http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/2009/04/13/king-content-needs-a-diet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/2009/04/13/king-content-needs-a-diet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relevance-is-mandatory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtowalkacrossthecountry.com/treetest/?p=58</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a simple principle for general-interest-ish publications an age of abundance:
Most readers don&#8217;t want more. They want less. Though they want more of it to be relevant.
Quicker is better.
Simple as that.
And as Eric Schmidt noted the other day: when speed is the goal, print still works faster than pixels.
Newspapers aren&#8217;t very fast.
But print is, or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/182/429053165_91923c6986.jpg?v=0"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/182/429053165_91923c6986.jpg?v=0" alt="" border="0" /></a>Here&#8217;s a simple principle for general-interest-ish publications an age of abundance:</p>
<p>Most readers don&#8217;t want more. They want less. Though they want more of it to be relevant.</p>
<p>Quicker is better.</p>
<p>Simple as that.<span id="fullpost"></p>
<p>And as Eric Schmidt noted the other day: when speed is the goal, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20090407/google-newspapers/">print still works faster than pixels</a>.</p>
<p><span style="font-style: italic;">Newspapers</span> aren&#8217;t very fast.</p>
<p>But print is, or can be.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why <a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/04/print-is-still-king-only-3-percent-of-newspaper-reading-actually-happens-online/">print is still king</a> among newspaper readers.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s something to consider.</p>
<p>(photo courtesy Flickr user <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/44124324682@N01/">mharrsch</a>)<br /></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oldforestnewtrees.com/2009/04/13/king-content-needs-a-diet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
